[arch-general] dev-public: Future build infrastructure for Arch Linux

[Morten Linderud]

On Mon, Sep 05, 2022 at 04:48:59AM -0500, David C. Rankin via arch-general wrote:
>   As far as the rational "Arch used to pride itself in providing optimised
> binaries out of the box.", I can't see compilation to v3 being more than an
> immeasurable instruction or two different from a build for v2 in all but
> rare packages. It's not like Arch is only used by a minority of users who
> "may" benefit from new gcc11 introduced optimizations.

The original RFC was to just up the baseline from v1 to v2, but this was
rejected for a separate v3 port instead.

See the discussion here,
https://gitlab.archlinux.org/archlinux/rfcs/-/merge_requests/2

-- 
Morten Linderud
PGP: 9C02FF419FECBE16
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 833 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <https://lists.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-general/attachments/20220905/0c8df4de/attachment.sig>