buchuki at gmail.com
Wed Nov 30 22:33:26 EST 2005
I think we definately want to follow arch32. We aern't making a new
distro here. Eventually the packages want to be included into the 64
bit tree in ArchLinux. Once some dev has a 64bit machine it will
probably go more mainstream, I hope. Until then, I'd say our primary
goal is to get it working for us. AFAIK, Seshu is the only one
successfully running Arch64, but he's a bit of a genius that just
kinds of fixes things as theey come up.
On 30/11/05, Andreas Radke <a.radke at arcor.de> wrote:
> Mr Green schrieb:
> >May I suggest we use a name for Arch64 release , I know we are using
> >Wombat atm but a 0.1 release <insert name here> let me know what you think
> First of all you should define our goal!
> I see two ways: one is to follow archlinux 32bit as much as possible and
> the other is to
> built our own different distribution only using current arch 32bit with
> it´s pacman a basement.
> I would prefer the first way. Don´t see the need to change much from
> arch32. I like arch 32bit as it is.
> So I would try to keep the system quiet up to date following the 32bit
> archlinux. So I want to see
> a first ISO release 0.7.1 shortly after noodle comes out.
> arch-ports mailing list
> arch-ports at archlinux.org
More information about the arch-ports