[arch-projects] Pacman improvement

[Ben Mazer]

On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 21:32, Michael Baehr wrote:
> I'm afraid I don't quite understand what you're getting at.  Could you
> explain a little more?

You're quite daft sometimes. :P

Also, it might be better to have an alternation of big C and little c,
to show a "chomping" motion.

Oh, and it should be written in Python.

	Ben
-- 
Now remember, we can't ALL sign with an X
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/attachments/20040824/d0feff49/attachment.pgp>