[arch-projects] Pacman improvement
ben at benmazer.net
Tue Aug 24 23:50:15 EDT 2004
On Tue, 2004-08-24 at 21:32, Michael Baehr wrote:
> I'm afraid I don't quite understand what you're getting at. Could you
> explain a little more?
You're quite daft sometimes. :P
Also, it might be better to have an alternation of big C and little c,
to show a "chomping" motion.
Oh, and it should be written in Python.
Now remember, we can't ALL sign with an X
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 189 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the arch-projects