[arch-projects] [netcfg] Call for testers: netctl
graysky at archlinux.us
Mon Dec 31 15:19:56 EST 2012
On Mon, Dec 31, 2012 at 1:51 PM, Jouke Witteveen <j.witteveen at gmail.com> wrote:
> Are these results structural? You should probably compare
> netctl at static to netcfg at static, but other than that I would expect not
> much of a difference. The control flow is very similar, with a
> preference for netctl, as (I think) it will do less function calls.
> Also, keep in mind that due to parallelization, these timings are not
> extremely important. The difference is strange, though. It might be
> openresolv that takes a bit longer than writing to resolv.conf
> directly, but 700ms seems a bit much.
>> % cat /etc/network.d/static
> This line is not needed, as $BindToInterfaces defaults to $Interface.
OK! I'm not sure what you mean by 'structural' but after a reboot, it
seems that the times are much closer to each other now:
% systemd-analyze blame
3479ms netctl at static.service
Also, thanks for the suggestion about the profile. I too like the
interface you have designed and hope others agree. Keep up the
excellent start you've made with netctl!
More information about the arch-projects