[arch-projects] [RFC 03/23] Add warning if dependencies are missing

Matthew Monaco dgbaley27 at 0x01b.net
Fri May 18 19:57:19 EDT 2012

On 05/18/2012 04:09 PM, Tom Gundersen wrote:
> On Fri, May 18, 2012 at 6:21 PM, Matthew Monaco <dgbaley27 at 0x01b.net> wrote:
>> I don't really like this, it would be better to check only for
>> cryptsetup here, other checks can go where they're used or not at all.
>> The best might be to not do anything like this at all.
> I'm not a big fan of this. Just deal with errors properly where they
> might happen (as other things than a missing binary might go wrong).
> If you are confident that this warning will give no false positives
> (i.e. warn about missing stuff which actually does not matter), then
> it's fine, but I don't think it is worth the effort.
> -t

(Given the commit message) that's enough convincing for me =)

-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: signature.asc
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 900 bytes
Desc: OpenPGP digital signature
URL: <http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/arch-projects/attachments/20120518/4fe1cb24/attachment.asc>

More information about the arch-projects mailing list