[arch-releng] btrfs support in aif
C Anthony Risinger
anthony at extof.me
Sun Dec 19 19:19:43 EST 2010
On Sun, Dec 19, 2010 at 12:50 PM, Dieter Plaetinck <dieter at plaetinck.be> wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Dec 2010 22:03:39 -0600
> C Anthony Risinger <anthony at extof.me> wrote:
>> all this weekend and next week my fiance and son are going to the
>> grandparents early for holidays... so i plan on h at ckz0r1ng nonstop and
>> only sleeping when my feeble human body demands it... this hook is
>> the first thing on my agenda, and the fun starts saturday afternoon
> nice to read that. I thought your hook would be fairly done by now.
beh, already on me?!? haha j/k, i thought it would too...
> (assuming everything you explained is what is currently working, or was
> that how you want it to be?)
the format works, i'm working on the automation part now; before i was
manually moving symlinks :-)
the btrfsadm management tool is the hardest part; but still not to
bad. the hook is actually very small and simple now. working more
today and probably some tomorrow.
> I don't plan to add more to aif then required (you mentioned
> I could create the basic structure), I'll just strongly recommend users
> to use subvolumes.
that's fine; if you can do you best to _strongly_ suggest (or enforce
:-) that users install into a dedicated subvol, it will make things
much safer/smoother on my end (and user...). i really can't think of
a single practical objection or downside to doing this procedure.
> I'm a bit burned out right now from my recent Arch work, not sure when I
> will start working on btrfs subvolume support.
no worries. probably not this release, but by the next spin of
install media, what do you think about including the hook + tool as an
option to those installing to a btrfs root? do we do things like
that? i suppose the install media is pretty strapped for space.
More information about the arch-releng