[arch-releng] automated iso builds

Dieter Plaetinck dieter at plaetinck.be
Thu Feb 11 02:29:27 EST 2010


On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 18:56:58 -0300
Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi <vmlinuz386 at yahoo.com.ar> wrote:

> > On Wed, 10 Feb 2010 17:29:15 -0300
> > Gerardo Exequiel Pozzi<vmlinuz386 at yahoo.com.ar>  wrote:
> >> Done: http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/18277
> >>
> >>      
> > any ETA on a new squashfs release? maybe we should give them some
> > time instead of patching ourself. although it looks like they don't
> > release very often and this patch is a few months old.
> >
> >    
> What is ETA? The patch does not look bad and solves the issue. Seems 
> that release of squashfs-tools are a bit slow:
> 4.0 2009/04
> 3.4 2008/08
> 3.0 2006/03
> 
> More info about bug report here: 
> http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_name=87k529zp8f.fsf%40macbook.be.48ers.dk

allright. fine by me then. hope Tpowa accepts it :)
(eta = estimated time of arrival)

> I guessed that you have enabled [testing] at all (on your enviroment
> and on iso) in reference to this:
> 
> On 02/09/2010 06:28 PM, Dieter Plaetinck wrote:
>  > i built this experimental isolinux image (with testing repo
>  > enabled!),
> 
> Latest git of archiso requires "mkinitcpio-0.6" from testing (by
> error, Aaron merge my "experimental" branch instead of "djgera") [#1]
> otherwise you need to reset to commit a2f6841c so can build against 
> current [core].

I meant that the iso is built from testing+core packages.  The
environment (build-chroot) is core only.
Frankly I'm not sure if there's much point in doing this.  Maybe it's
better to only use core for both the chroot and the actual iso's

Dieter


More information about the arch-releng mailing list