[arch-security] systemd

[G. Schlisio]

Am 21.12.2014 um 18:57 schrieb Scott Lawrence:
> Why are these relevant on the arch-security list? Are either of these
> exploitable, even in theory?
> 
> On Sun, 21 Dec 2014, Xan wrote:
> 
>> Hi,
>>
>> Perhaps someone could be insterested in those:
>> http://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=14/12/21/1343258
>>
>> You're welcome,
>>
> 

i tend to think arch-security is about security concerning exploits,
(remote) attacs etc, not about 'running security' or system stability,
wich might be described as safety. according to this xan's post does not
belong here, but i might be mistaken.

by the way: scott, please refrain from top-posting on all mailinglists
on arch, there is a strict bottom-post-policy.

thankyou