[arch-security] systemd

[Xan]

Mmm... thanks. I didn't know that. Sorry.

Xan

On Sun, 21 Dec 2014 23:21:46 +0100
"G. Schlisio" <g.schlisio at dukun.de> ha escrit:

> Am 21.12.2014 um 18:57 schrieb Scott Lawrence:
> > Why are these relevant on the arch-security list? Are either of these
> > exploitable, even in theory?
> > 
> > On Sun, 21 Dec 2014, Xan wrote:
> > 
> >> Hi,
> >>
> >> Perhaps someone could be insterested in those:
> >> http://soylentnews.org/article.pl?sid=14/12/21/1343258
> >>
> >> You're welcome,
> >>
> > 
> 
> i tend to think arch-security is about security concerning exploits,
> (remote) attacs etc, not about 'running security' or system stability,
> wich might be described as safety. according to this xan's post does not
> belong here, but i might be mistaken.
> 
> by the way: scott, please refrain from top-posting on all mailinglists
> on arch, there is a strict bottom-post-policy.
> 
> thankyou