[aur-dev] Patches on the list

[Simo Leone]

Alright, so we've got some confusion going on, let's straighten it out
real quick.

Can we agree on this stuff?

- patches sent to the list should *always* apply against either 
  the master or testing branches on projects.archlinux.org
- patches that depend on something which wasn't yet committed to the
  repo should probably go in the same thread to avoid confusion, or be
  super duper explicit about it someplace in the message, maybe even link
  to the patch it depends on if it's in a new thread.
- patches that revert things sent to the list but not yet comitted to
  the repo aren't needed at all. Since it hasn't been comitted yet, I
  think a short message to say "don't add this one!" is enough and will
  avoid a lot of confusion.
- I don't always have as much free time as I wish I did, I'll start
  trying to set aside time just for the AUR and see if it gets me
  anywhere.
- Tacos and Chipotle burritos are awesome.


-Simo
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/attachments/20080218/cfd8d91a/attachment.pgp>