[aur-dev] Patches on the list
louipc.ist at gmail.com
Mon Feb 18 20:50:05 EST 2008
On Mon, Feb 18, 2008 at 5:33 PM, Simo Leone <simo at archlinux.org> wrote:
> Alright, so we've got some confusion going on, let's straighten it out
> real quick.
> Can we agree on this stuff?
> - patches sent to the list should *always* apply against either
> the master or testing branches on projects.archlinux.org
> - patches that depend on something which wasn't yet committed to the
> repo should probably go in the same thread to avoid confusion, or be
> super duper explicit about it someplace in the message, maybe even link
> to the patch it depends on if it's in a new thread.
> - patches that revert things sent to the list but not yet comitted to
> the repo aren't needed at all. Since it hasn't been comitted yet, I
> think a short message to say "don't add this one!" is enough and will
> avoid a lot of confusion.
> - I don't always have as much free time as I wish I did, I'll start
> trying to set aside time just for the AUR and see if it gets me
> - Tacos and Chipotle burritos are awesome.
Sounds pretty sound to me. Cheers.
More information about the aur-dev