[aur-general] Should I bring rpm/dkpg to community

[Roman Kyrylych]

2008/4/6, RedShift <redshift at pandora.be>:
> Allan McRae wrote:
>
> > Hi TU's,
> >
> > I was wondering what peoples opinions are about putting rpm/dpkg in
> [community].  They both have a descent number of votes (27 & 33) so people
> obviously find them useful.  Does anyone have objections about their
> "unArchness" (it is a real word, honest!)?  It is what has stopped me moving
> dpkg so far...
>
>  As far as I am concerned, rpm, dpkg, etc... are just pieces of software. I
> see no reason why they shouldn't be included in community. It would even be
> an advantage, you could install distributions that use dpkg or rpm from Arch
> Linux.
>

I think they shouldn't be in community for reasons similar to why
qpkg/aurbuild/yaourt are not in community.

-- 
Roman Kyrylych (Роман Кирилич)