[aur-general] TU Vote: Daenyth
geoffroy.carrier at koon.fr
Sun Aug 10 20:30:18 EDT 2008
On Mon, Aug 11, 2008 at 02:24, bardo <ilbardo at gmail.com> wrote:
> And this should be done during the discussion period. We already
> discussed the matter last year, IIRC.
> (Actually, I was the one who voted no and explained why only during
> the voting period... even though the candidate didn't pass, my action
> wan't exactly appreciated.)
I think "voting period" shouldn't mean "no discussion period".
We need a "discussion period" before the "voting period" to make sure
people have time to express their opinion, but that shouldn't prevent
us from discussing after it, should it?
More information about the aur-general