[aur-general] community back-end rewrite
aaronmgriffin at gmail.com
Mon Dec 1 10:57:37 EST 2008
On Mon, Dec 1, 2008 at 9:55 AM, Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Sun, Nov 30, 2008 at 7:35 PM, Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org> wrote:
>> Hi all,
>> In the TU meetings there was some discussion about doing a
>> rewrite/update/fix-up of the [community] back-end. I am not sure who all is
>> looking at this and what the plans are - hence this email.
>> Can people who are looking at this or interested in looking at this give a
>> ping back to this message with whatever plans you have or work you have
>> already done.
>> Things I want to flag:
>> - we should get a git repo for a community-backend project on the arch
>> server and separate this from the aur site code. - we should switch SCM
>> tools from CVS. I am strongly in favour of using the same system as the
>> main repos which would allow much code reuse and easily get us a testing
>> repo for community packages. (No more big rebuild issues!).
> To whoever is doing this: Please remain in touch with me for this. I
> would *love* it if the community backend just ran the official db
> scripts under the 'aur' user. This would not only simplify the code,
> but allow us to unify lots of changes.
> Additionally, the database itself should be updated the same way the
> official database is done - parse the db.tar.gz and
> insert/update/delete accordingly.
> In short: the community backend should really just accept packages via
> upload (authenticated, or course), dump them in a common location
> (/home/aur/staging) and then setup a cronjob to run db-update
> periodically. This cronjob should also find packages in the db.tar.gz
> and not in CVS and run db-remove on them.
> If we can collaborate enough on this, we could even use the same
> functionality for extra and core.
Note that the above regarding db-update requires a move to svn at the
same time. I do not plan to add special code to deal with CVS
More information about the aur-general