[aur-general] Official discussion period - Rules governing packages entering [community]
daenyth+arch at gmail.com
Fri Dec 5 10:18:00 EST 2008
On Fri, Dec 5, 2008 at 10:13, Callan Barrett <wizzomafizzo at gmail.com> wrote:
> But why? Why make 2 definite sets of votes when it's just as easy to
> bring this up again if it's not working out? This just seems like an
> out for people who don't want this to happen, if you don't like it you
> should vote no on it.
> Callan Barrett
I'm in favor of the current proposal, but it's been brought up before,
by bfinch I believe, that it might become difficult to remove this at
a later date. He never explained why it would be difficult, but I
thought that this was a decent compromise to alleviate such concerns.
I could be way off base though on this, though. I haven't really given
the idea a lot of thought.
More information about the aur-general