[aur-general] Official discussion period - Rules governing packages entering [community]

bardo ilbardo at gmail.com
Fri Dec 5 10:21:22 EST 2008

2008/12/5 Callan Barrett <wizzomafizzo at gmail.com>:
> But why? Why make 2 definite sets of votes when it's just as easy to
> bring this up again if it's not working out? This just seems like an
> out for people who don't want this to happen, if you don't like it you
> should vote no on it.

I agree, let's see how this vote goes, then eventually decide for
alternatives. I wrote my ideas not to ask to change the current
proposal, but only to have people consider them as alternatives. I
don't think it's right to criticize without at least trying to find
viable alternatives.


More information about the aur-general mailing list