[aur-general] Should TU put in [community] packages they use?

[Darwin Bautista]

IMHO, TUs should prioritize packages with sufficiently high votes (and
are eligible, of course). I've seen quite a lot of "unpopular"
(software that I haven't even heard of before and probably
never/seldom used) packages in community lately when there are in fact
a lot of other, more popular, packages that needs a TU's love.

(I'm not a TU but I also use [community] that's why I wanted my voice
to be heard.)

On Jan 18, 2008 9:50 PM, bardo <ilbardo at gmail.com> wrote:
> This came to my mind reading the discussion about Sergej, but after
> some thinking I couldn't make up a clear opinion about it, so this
> thread just brings up the question.
>
> There's a few packages I maintain in unsupported that almost nobody
> voted, so I never moved them to [community]. But what if I use them in
> my daily activities? I'm interested in having an up-to-date package,
> so I'd maintain, build and test it anyway... should I share it with
> its (small) user base?

-- 
Darwin M. Bautista
BS Electronics and Communications Engineering
University of the Philippines Diliman
http://www.darwin.uk.to

University of the Philippines Linux Users' Group
http://www.uplug.org