[aur-general] compiz-fusion?

Allan McRae mcrae_allan at hotmail.com
Sat Mar 15 08:10:15 EDT 2008

Thomas Bächler wrote:
> JJDaNiMoTh schrieb:
>> I'm building it on 64 bit builder machine. It need time because I 
>> first need to compile compiz-core, then wait
>> sync of pacman db, and compile other things, then wait the sync etc...
>> This is the problem.
>> Now seems that remote pacman syncs itself every hours, so ( without
>> mirror problems ) I think this situation could be resolved in 4-5
>> hours.
>> Excuse me, but I think we need more TU for x86_64, of course we can't
>> carry on with this situation. At least, only ' rebuilding monkey ' for
>> 64 bit... Although Aaron give us the building machine, it isn't the 
>> same ( again thanks anyway, Aaron.. without it would be worse )
> Wow, that sucks, I thought someone else built those for you.
> I am rather surprised: Almost everyone in the dev team has at least 
> one AMD64 or Core2 (maybe newer P4) machine, I thought this should be 
> the same for the TU team by now.
> This situation is BAD and it needs to be resolved, because all this 
> leads to breakage for end-users. How do we get more TUs with 64 bit 
> machines?
A quick count of the Trusted User wiki pages shows that 7 out of ~25 
TU's have x86_64 access.  For groups of packages like compiz-fusion, 
where many packages need updated at once, perhaps it would be better to 
just ask for a builder on the mailing list. I have seen TU's voted in 
primarily on the strength of having a 64bit machine to do building on so...

I'll help out intermittently (my 64bit machine is really my wifes 


More information about the aur-general mailing list