[aur-general] AUR Cleanup Day organization
mcrae_allan at hotmail.com
Fri May 2 11:27:15 EDT 2008
Lukáš Jirkovský wrote:
> But in other way, packages without arch field are usually very, very old.
Then they probably fall in this category of the suggest removal guidelines
- outdated and orphaned packages with few or no votes
This situation is behind my reasoning to create a list of potential
removals first. I think we need to be careful of removing too many
packages, especially in our first cleanup attempt. Just the really
unneeded ones as a first step. I had even considered that once the list
was made, then I would archive all the relevant PKGBUILDs before
deleting them. But it would be better to just not delete useful packages
in the first place...
More information about the aur-general