[aur-general] AUR Cleanup Day organization

[Lukáš Jirkovský]

But in other way, packages without arch field are usually very, very old.

2008/5/2 Allan McRae <mcrae_allan at hotmail.com>:
> Callan Barrett wrote:
>
> > On Fri, May 2, 2008 at 10:08 PM, Lukáš Jirkovský <l.jirkovsky at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> >
> >
> > > Just my 2 cents: I think, that packages without arch=() field should
> > >  be also removed.
> > >
> > >
> >
> > That seems like a bit much. There's probably a lot of good packages in
> > the AUR without this field and it's not like it's that hard to add it
> > in yourself.
> >
> >
> >
>
>  I agree we should not remove packages on the basis of the arch field.  We
> don't want to delete potentially useful packages.
>
>
>
> >
> > >
> > > I suggest you use a public channel instead of the TU channel, so that
> other Arch users can participate and why not adopt packages live. Not the
> Arch one though, it's too crowded. Maybe you could create a temporary
> channel for the event...
> > >
> > >
> >
> > Agree with this, why not let as many people as possible get involved
> > to get the most done.
> >
> >
> >
>
>  OK.  Given I know very, very little about IRC, does someone else want to
> make an IRC channel.  Either that, or we could ask if it would be OK to use
> the archlinux-bugs (or whatever it is called) channel which tends to have
> very low traffic levels apart from bug days.
>
>  Allan
>
>
>
>