[aur-general] should make be in makedepends?
neil at darlow.co.uk
Tue May 6 02:01:04 EDT 2008
Allan McRae wrote:
> We generally assume the user has everything in base and base-devel
> installed and so don't list those packages.
Aren't there exceptions? Doesn't it make sense to include things which a
configure script might determine as optional, e.g. gettext?
I think studying the output of configure and making a reasoned decision
on what to put in makedepends is often better that just assuming the
presence of something.
More information about the aur-general