[aur-general] should make be in makedepends?
wizzomafizzo at gmail.com
Tue May 6 02:11:54 EDT 2008
On Tue, May 6, 2008 at 2:01 PM, Neil Darlow <neil at darlow.co.uk> wrote:
> Aren't there exceptions? Doesn't it make sense to include things which a
> configure script might determine as optional, e.g. gettext?
> I think studying the output of configure and making a reasoned decision on
> what to put in makedepends is often better that just assuming the presence
> of something.
Yes, but in general you would just assume everything in base is
installed. That doesn't mean you throw out all reason as well.
More information about the aur-general