[aur-general] Where to put your name when you adopt an AUR package (was: TU Application)

[stefan-husmann at t-online.de]

>-----Original Message-----
>Date: Thu, 09 Oct 2008 16:25:23 +0200
>Subject: Re: [aur-general] Where to put your name when you adopt an AUR
package (was: TU Application)
>From: "Daenyth Blank" <daenyth+arch at gmail.com>
>To: "Discussion about the Arch User Repository (AUR)"
<aur-general at archlinux.org>
>
>Regardless of what it once was, I think the current method is silly
>and needlessly confusing. Contributor should be there to credit the
>previous handlers for a package. Maintainer should just be the person
>who is currently in charge of keeping it working, whether binary or
>otherwise. Pacman's "Packager" data is kept for the binary files,
>making the current use of Maintainer redundant.
>
>I think it should be changed to the more logical way. Anyone else have
>an opinion on that?


I think this is about the same as Callan said, and I gave him a 1+,
which mees that I agree.

Regards Stefan