[aur-general] Where to put your name when you adopt an AUR package (was: TU Application)
anders1 at gmail.com
Thu Oct 9 19:25:28 EDT 2008
On Thu, Oct 9, 2008 at 4:25 PM, Daenyth Blank <daenyth+arch at gmail.com> wrote:
> Regardless of what it once was, I think the current method is silly
> and needlessly confusing. Contributor should be there to credit the
> previous handlers for a package. Maintainer should just be the person
> who is currently in charge of keeping it working, whether binary or
> otherwise. Pacman's "Packager" data is kept for the binary files,
> making the current use of Maintainer redundant.
> I think it should be changed to the more logical way. Anyone else have
> an opinion on that?
Hm, this is quite a "me too" post :)
More information about the aur-general