[aur-general] TU Application
ilbardo at gmail.com
Fri Sep 12 14:15:41 EDT 2008
On Fri, Sep 12, 2008 at 7:22 PM, Paulo Matias <matias at archlinux-br.org> wrote:
> If the user wants ALSA back, she only needs to remove the OSS package.
So this means that the two systems can't coexist... I can't say I like
it (I may prefer to use a particular sound system for a certain
feature the other one misses) but at the moment I don't think there
are other solutions.
> In the install script (take a look at
We'll have to talk about that file (maybe in private, I'm hijacking
the thread and it isn't nice), in particular about the removal of
libflashsupport, which is also provided in libflashsupport-pulse, a
package I've been wanting to move to [community] for a while.
> No users had complained about problems restoring ALSA, so I think this
> problem was present only in old packages, packaged by past
Yeah, I got it with oss-linux-free, IIRC. Anyway, I *personally* think
that no package should touch files owned by other packages, even
though it seems harmless and reversible. I'd like to hear from others
about this, though.
More information about the aur-general