[aur-general] the gimmie package

M. Rawash mrawash at gmail.com
Wed Sep 24 19:36:41 EDT 2008

On Thu, 2008-09-25 at 00:51 +0200, stefan-husmann at t-online.de wrote:
> -----Original Message-----
> Date: Thu, 25 Sep 2008 00:08:14 +0200
> Subject: Re: [aur-general] the gimmie package
> From: "M. Rawash" <mrawash at gmail.com>
> To: aur-general at archlinux.org
> sorry, i usually build a package locally before i complain about it.
> nothing is wrong with gimmie under arch, it's just the binary package
> that is broken, a proper repackaging should do the trick..
> regards
> m rawash
> Hello,
> please nevertheless file a bug report. What architecture did you install
> the binary package on? Error messages?
> I installed the binary package and there seems nothing wrong for me, I
> did not need to rebuild.
> Stefan

well, i cannot reproduce it now, since it's been fixed, but you can read
the latest two comments at
http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=7793 , which is exactly what i
used to get before rebuilding (using a clean PKGBUILD). my arch is i686.


More information about the aur-general mailing list