[aur-general] How to handle interchangeable dependencies?

[hollunder at gmx.at]

On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 10:02:41 -0400
Loui Chang <louipc.ist at gmail.com> wrote:

> On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 03:45:43PM +0200, hollunder at gmx.at wrote:
> > On Mon, 6 Apr 2009 09:34:03 -0400
> > Loui Chang <louipc.ist at gmail.com> wrote:
> > 
> > > On Mon, Apr 06, 2009 at 02:55:52PM +0200, hollunder at gmx.at wrote:
> > > > So this is a bug in yaourt, the second today it seems.
> > > > Guess I start hunting for the yaourt and namcap bugtrackers..
> > > 
> > > When tracking down bugs please do not pollute your results by
> > > relying on unsupported scripts.
> > 
> > The problem is that even if those scripts are unsupported they are
> > widely used (well, namcap not as widely a one could wish).
> 
> It should be clear if you saw the disclaimer on the AUR home page.
> I guess that could be a case to put the disclaimer on every page, so
> the point is hammered in. Heh.

Won't help ;)
 
> Namcap is a supported script by the way.

I figured in the meantime :)

> > Does one know how to report bugs for namcap?
> 
> Arch Linux bug tracker:
> http://bugs.archlinux.org/index.php?project=1&do=index&switch=1

Already reported:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14124?opened=4326

Does the AUR webpage and yaourt rely on namcap as well? Both don't get
it right either.

'+' bug for yaourt reported here:
http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/14122?opened=4326


Best regards,
Philipp