[aur-general] When does a package need -svn?
allan at archlinux.org
Fri Apr 24 22:57:17 EDT 2009
Ray Rashif wrote:
>> Actually, it is distributed under the GPL, so that is techniqually fine...
> Yes, but that is why I mentioned "author's intentions".
But the author also intends you to provide the source when you
distribute binaries. That is why they used the GPL license. So I would
pick that intention over the contradictory one...
More information about the aur-general