[aur-general] When does a package need -svn?
garoth at gmail.com
Sat Apr 25 14:17:40 EDT 2009
Legal licence holds some more weight over their strange habits, I think.
On Fri, Apr 24, 2009 at 10:57 PM, Allan McRae <allan at archlinux.org> wrote:
> Ray Rashif wrote:
>>> Actually, it is distributed under the GPL, so that is techniqually
>> Yes, but that is why I mentioned "author's intentions".
> But the author also intends you to provide the source when you distribute
> binaries. That is why they used the GPL license. So I would pick that
> intention over the contradictory one...
More information about the aur-general