[aur-general] TU application: Laszlo Papp

[Jaroslav Lichtblau]

On Sun, Aug 02, 2009 at 10:22:16PM +0200, Laszlo Papp wrote:
> On Sun, Aug 2, 2009 at 9:45 PM, Mateusz Herych <heniekk at gmail.com> wrote:
> 
> > Hello Laszlo.
> >
> > I see many of your vim-* packages has the same voters:
> > alephlg, Gaboo, raron, zsomi, Suicidium, rhen
> > Let's look into their IDs..
> >
> > alephlg - 16066
> > Gaboo - 16077
> > raron - 16081
> > zsomi - 16070
> > Suicidium - 16075
> > rhen - 16080
> >
> > Does it mean these accounts were registered in the same time? If so,
> > that looks a bit strange for me. Could you explain it? Maybe i'm
> > wrong.
> >
> > Regards,
> > Mateusz.
> 
> 
> Hello Mateusz!
> 
> As I said similarly earlier:
> 
> I took an advertisment in vim channel on freenode, and among work colleague,
> and friends, familiars. Something similar, "More vim plugins are available
> in AUR, you can try it, if you feel so". It's true I've got so much VIM fan
> friends, colleague, familiars in the real life, and on the internet too.
> Maybe this is the reason.

Are all those friends of your also running Arch Linux? The names of
the voters do not change much and also voted on packages you proposed
to bring into [community] repository - reaching the 10 votes limit.
Did you advertised those packages too to them?
 
> I didn't take deeper researching in this matter, who voted for those
> package, or who didn't, because I think it's their private decision to vote
> for a package or not, so i didn't asked them. I keep in respect their
> decision. But I always vote for my packages :)
> 
> Nevertheless I've disowned most of the vim related packages, because I'd
> like to deal with embedded development packages better.

Not that keeping those vim plugins would take much work, they don't
change that offen to my knowledge.

> I won't be very active tomorrow in the daytime, but I will reply for all
> your questions at evening.
> 
> Best Regards,
> Laszlo Papp
> 

Thanks for all those quick answers, that keeps the discussion
swift.

Jaroslav


-- 
        When devfs went into the tree, the word was "at least it will
make people look at the code".  Well, it did.  Veni, vidi, vomere.

	- Al Viro on linux-kernel
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Type: application/pgp-signature
Size: 197 bytes
Desc: not available
URL: <http://www.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/attachments/20090802/32ac5bc8/attachment.pgp>