[aur-general] Voting for djszapi results
snowmaniscool at gmail.com
Thu Dec 17 04:03:15 EST 2009
On Wed, Dec 16, 2009 at 8:22 PM, Ranguvar <ranguvar at archlinux.us> wrote:
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA512
> 2009/12/16 Sergej Pupykin <pupykin.s at gmail.com>:
>> the voting period for djszapi has ended, and he did not get the majority
>> of votes. He got
>> Yes: 4
>> No: 9
>> Abstain: 5
>> It would be nice if there would be some discussion about the reasons for the
> I've known djszapi for a few weeks now via IM.
> I had not examined his packages in _great_ detail, but in person,
> Laszlo appeared quite capable of TU work, especially considering his
> extremely active involvement with the AUR2 project.
> I do not know of past issues, as I am still fairly new to Arch and
> newer to acting as a TU, but there did not seem to be any major
> blockers to provent Laszlo from becoming a TU,
> and because he seems to have quite a bit of knowledge and dedication,
> I voted 'yes' for his approval.
> Would someone who was around at the time then please summarize what
> issues, if any, were present before? Has Laszlo already applied once
> and been rejected, as it seems?
> -- Ranguvar
Laszlo has previously applied not long ago, maybe a month (search ML
archive). Some concerns were brought up in a somwhat heated (IIRC)
discussion period. Finally, he retracted his candidacy before the
vote. I guess most TU had made up their mind at that point. So this
time, they felt that nothing was left to discuss so everyone just
waited for the voting period.
More information about the aur-general