[aur-general] Voting for djszapi results

[Ranguvar]

-----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
Hash: SHA512

2009/12/16 Sergej Pupykin <pupykin.s at gmail.com>:
> Hello,
>
> the voting period for djszapi has ended, and he did not get the majority
> of votes. He got
>
> Yes: 4
> No: 9
> Abstain: 5
>
> It would be nice if there would be some discussion about the reasons for the
> failure.

I've known djszapi for a few weeks now via IM.
I had not examined his packages in _great_ detail, but in person,
Laszlo appeared quite capable of TU work, especially considering his
extremely active involvement with the AUR2 project.

I do not know of past issues, as I am still fairly new to Arch and
newer to acting as a TU, but there did not seem to be any major
blockers to provent Laszlo from becoming a TU,
and because he seems to have quite a bit of knowledge and dedication,
I voted 'yes' for his approval.

Would someone who was around at the time then please summarize what
issues, if any, were present before?  Has Laszlo already applied once
and been rejected, as it seems?

  -- Ranguvar
  [Devin Cofer]
-----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
Version: GnuPG v2.0.13 (GNU/Linux)
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=i+gL
-----END PGP SIGNATURE-----