[aur-general] Package voting alternatives
arch-general at fukawi2.nl
Sun Dec 27 04:35:14 EST 2009
2009/12/27 Jeff Horelick <jdhore1 at gmail.com>:
> As far as actual voting though, i think be best option might be a sliding
> vote scale, possibly like the vote at the Vim website for Vim scripts. Offer
> 3 "vote options" like: "Great package." "Meh." "Rubbish." and that'll likely
> give the best idea of package usage/quality.
Relative voting instead of absolute values? Could work..
The best way is of course a system like pkgstats, but that opens the
whole privacy issue etc....
More information about the aur-general