[aur-general] status moving to official db scripts?
louipc.ist at gmail.com
Thu Mar 5 17:28:30 EST 2009
On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:46:49AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
> Andrea Scarpino wrote:
> > 2009/3/5 Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>:
> >> But, I guess you're right
> >> that the AUR needs some sort of changes in order to be able to do
> >> this.
> > Maybe we must only edit run-tupkgupdate and communitypkg on AUR?
> > (not sure of this)
> Well, those will not be needed at all once the switch is made. The decision
> on whether to include [community] packages on the AUR interface after the
> switch, or even extend it to all packages was the main issue. I think it
> was decided that they were to be included, so I was wanting to know who is
> doing the coding and what the progress is.
Hmm! That's news. I thought the consensus was that community doesn't
need AUR. And in that case we just turn the daemons and cronjobs off and
community goes on its merry way with devtools.
We would then just alter the DB to make all community packages dummies.
More information about the aur-general