[aur-general] status moving to official db scripts?
allan at archlinux.org
Thu Mar 5 17:43:43 EST 2009
Loui Chang wrote:
> On Fri, Mar 06, 2009 at 06:46:49AM +1000, Allan McRae wrote:
>> Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>>> 2009/3/5 Aaron Griffin <aaronmgriffin at gmail.com>:
>>>> But, I guess you're right
>>>> that the AUR needs some sort of changes in order to be able to do
>>> Maybe we must only edit run-tupkgupdate and communitypkg on AUR?
>>> (not sure of this)
>> Well, those will not be needed at all once the switch is made. The decision
>> on whether to include [community] packages on the AUR interface after the
>> switch, or even extend it to all packages was the main issue. I think it
>> was decided that they were to be included, so I was wanting to know who is
>> doing the coding and what the progress is.
> Hmm! That's news. I thought the consensus was that community doesn't
> need AUR. And in that case we just turn the daemons and cronjobs off and
> community goes on its merry way with devtools.
> We would then just alter the DB to make all community packages dummies.
Hmm! Right back.... I thought we got to here:
which sort of says we were going to have them in the AUR along with the
rest of the repo and just disable comments. Anyway, I suppose this
could be added at any time.
But given I don't want them there, I agree that we decided [community]
does not need AUR!
More information about the aur-general