[aur-general] Package in AUR with same name of one in extra

Renato Garcia fgar.renato at gmail.com
Tue Nov 3 01:05:02 EST 2009


What is the better approach in this situations, put a package like
opencv-2.0 on AUR or don't distribute my up-to-date packages?

I say this because the package opencv is orphan, then there aren't
anybody to send the up-to-date PKGBUILD.

On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:24:43 +0100
Laszlo Papp <djszapi at archlinux.us> wrote:

> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Renato Garcia <fgar.renato at gmail.com>
> wrote:
> > Hi,
> >
> > Forgive me, I send the package opencv version 2.0.0 to AUR, without
> > change its name to opencv-2.0. Now there are two packages with name
> > opencv, one in extra (version 1.1pre1) and other in AUR (version
> > 2.0.0).
> >
> > If you could rename or delete the package in AUR, or update the
> > package in extra (it is orphan), I will be grateful.
> >
> > Regards
> >
> > Renato Garcia
> >
> 
> Renaming can't be solved, just deleting.
> Be patient, it will be updated soon :)
> 
> Best Regards,
> Laszlo Papp


More information about the aur-general mailing list