[aur-general] Package in AUR with same name of one in extra

[Laszlo Papp]

On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 7:05 AM, Renato Garcia <fgar.renato at gmail.com> wrote:
> What is the better approach in this situations, put a package like
> opencv-2.0 on AUR or don't distribute my up-to-date packages?
>
> I say this because the package opencv is orphan, then there aren't
> anybody to send the up-to-date PKGBUILD.
>
> On Tue, 3 Nov 2009 06:24:43 +0100
> Laszlo Papp <djszapi at archlinux.us> wrote:
>
>> On Tue, Nov 3, 2009 at 6:11 AM, Renato Garcia <fgar.renato at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>> > Hi,
>> >
>> > Forgive me, I send the package opencv version 2.0.0 to AUR, without
>> > change its name to opencv-2.0. Now there are two packages with name
>> > opencv, one in extra (version 1.1pre1) and other in AUR (version
>> > 2.0.0).
>> >
>> > If you could rename or delete the package in AUR, or update the
>> > package in extra (it is orphan), I will be grateful.
>> >
>> > Regards
>> >
>> > Renato Garcia
>> >
>>
>> Renaming can't be solved, just deleting.
>> Be patient, it will be updated soon :)
>>
>> Best Regards,
>> Laszlo Papp
>

See a new ticket on http://bugs.archlinux.org, and attach the updated
PKGBUIILD, or if there is svn/git/cvs/etc. version controlled part of
it, upload it to AUR as opencv-git/svn/cvs/etc.

Best Regards,
Laszlo Papp