[aur-general] Deletion request
louipc.ist at gmail.com
Tue Nov 10 09:26:16 EST 2009
On Tue 10 Nov 2009 08:12 -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote:
> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:42, Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com> wrote:
> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Chris Brannon <cmbrannon79 at gmail.com> wrote:
> >> 2. luaexpat is required by all the prosody packages, whereas lua-expat
> >> is only required by lua-gtk.
> > lua-expat : provides=(luaexpat)
> Does the AUR parse provides= when listing depends? Pacman can use that
> info *if it's in a repo*, but can the same be said for AUR?
No, but that is something you should write when renaming a package.
And I don't think we should keep badly named packages around.
Change 'em and let the dependents catch up. This is 'unsupported' after
More information about the aur-general