[aur-general] Deletion request
djszapi at archlinux.us
Tue Nov 10 15:59:48 EST 2009
On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 3:26 PM, Loui Chang <louipc.ist at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Tue 10 Nov 2009 08:12 -0500, Daenyth Blank wrote:
>> On Tue, Nov 10, 2009 at 04:42, Xavier <shiningxc at gmail.com> wrote:
>> > On Sun, Nov 8, 2009 at 10:55 AM, Chris Brannon <cmbrannon79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> >> 2. luaexpat is required by all the prosody packages, whereas lua-expat
>> >> is only required by lua-gtk.
>> > lua-expat : provides=(luaexpat)
>> Does the AUR parse provides= when listing depends? Pacman can use that
>> info *if it's in a repo*, but can the same be said for AUR?
> No, but that is something you should write when renaming a package.
> And I don't think we should keep badly named packages around.
> Change 'em and let the dependents catch up. This is 'unsupported' after
Maybe it's worth to extend here, to avoid bad package naming in the future.
More information about the aur-general