[aur-general] xulrunner in AUR and extra?

Smartboy smartboyathome at gmail.com
Tue Oct 27 11:03:49 EDT 2009

I know it used to be required for Aptana, which is why it was uploaded (I
think). Now it isn't required by it anymore, though.


On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool at gmail.com>wrote:

> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Phillip Smith <arch-general at fukawi2.nl>
> wrote:
> > I'm going through the orphans list in the AUR at the moment looking for
> > packages to adopt, and came across xulrunner. Given then xulrunner is now
> in
> > extra, shouldn't it be removed from the AUR?
> >
> The package in AUR is xulrunner-1.8, not xulrunner.  I guess it's
> there because it is  (was?) required for apps that didn't worked with
> the latest xulrunner.

More information about the aur-general mailing list