[aur-general] xulrunner in AUR and extra?
stefan-husmann at t-online.de
Tue Oct 27 13:29:34 EDT 2009
> I know it used to be required for Aptana, which is why it was uploaded (I
> think). Now it isn't required by it anymore, though.
> On Mon, Oct 26, 2009 at 10:25 PM, Eric Bélanger <snowmaniscool at gmail.com>wrote:
>> On Tue, Oct 27, 2009 at 12:07 AM, Phillip Smith <arch-general at fukawi2.nl>
>>> I'm going through the orphans list in the AUR at the moment looking for
>>> packages to adopt, and came across xulrunner. Given then xulrunner is now
>>> extra, shouldn't it be removed from the AUR?
>> The package in AUR is xulrunner-1.8, not xulrunner. I guess it's
>> there because it is (was?) required for apps that didn't worked with
>> the latest xulrunner.
zattoo still needs it. It is flagged out of date, though.
More information about the aur-general