[aur-general] Drop LLVM from [community]

[Evangelos Foutras]

Ranguvar wrote:
> That's LLVM trying to use the a frontend which you don't have.
> You can install llvm-gcc to make it work, but I bet the AUR package isn't
> compatible with our new LLVM yet, I'll work on fixing that for the AUR
> maintainer once we finalize LLVM 2.6.
>
> Here's a reworked LLVM/Clang PKGBUILD, with some improvements from
> Evangelos's PKGBUILD (and a number of fixes to it, as well).
>
> I removed the perl dep because perl's in [core], for example.
>
> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 9:39 AM, Imanol Celaya <
> ornitorrincos at archlinux-es.org> wrote:
>
>   
>> On Sat, Oct 31, 2009 at 2:36 AM, Evangelos Foutras <foutrelis at gmail.com>
>> wrote:
>>     
>>> Evangelos Foutras wrote:
>>>       
>>>> Andrea Scarpino wrote:
>>>>         
>>>>> On 30/10/2009, Ranguvar <ranguvar at archlinux.us> wrote:
>>>>>
>>>>>           
>>>>>> Hello,
>>>>>>
>>>>>> The package 'llvm' is an orphaned [communuity] package.  I'd like to
>>>>>> request
>>>>>> that it me moved to the AUR so I can maintain it (I have an update and
>>>>>> overhaul ready) and I can also create a 'clang' package for it. (split
>>>>>> package for llvm AND clang)  Then it can be adopted by a TU if they
>>>>>>             
>> want
>>     
>>>>>> to
>>>>>> bring it back into [community].
>>>>>>
>>>>>>             
>>>>> I vote for "move it on AUR"
>>>>>           
>>>> I believe it should be kept in [community] as it takes a considerable
>>>> amount of time to compile (around 10 minutes on a C2D 2.66 GHz, using
>>>>         
>> both
>>     
>>>> cores).
>>>>
>>>> I must say I know close to nothing about LLVM, but I'm willing to
>>>>         
>> maintain
>>     
>>>> it and learn along the way. So, unless a more knowledgeable TU shows
>>>> interest, I'll adopt it in [community] and upload a new package (based
>>>>         
>> on
>>     
>>>> Ranguvar's PKGBUILD) in the following weeks.
>>>>         
>>> I've uploaded llvm 2.6-1 to [community-testing]. It doesn't include
>>>       
>> clang,
>>     
>>> as I believe it should be built as a separate package. I think it's
>>>       
>> possible
>>     
>>> to download both llvm and clang tarballs, place clang inside the tools
>>> subdirectory and run `make install' from there. We'll need to investigate
>>> this possibility.
>>>
>>> Testing of the uploaded packages would be appreciated. :)
>>>
>>>       
>> I've found an error:
>>
>> [ilcra1989 at acheron ~]$ llvmc test.c
>> llvmc: Can't find program 'llvm-gcc'
>>
>>     

Let's continue the discussion on the related report on the bug tracker.

http://bugs.archlinux.org/task/16920