[aur-general] even and elasticdog status?

[Andrea Scarpino]

On 01/11/2009, Chris Brannon <cmbrannon79 at gmail.com> wrote:
> -1.  There's only one condition under which I'd vote to remove somebody:
> *intentional harm* to the distro.
>
> But FWIW, Elasticdog recently sent a post to the ML stating that he was
> inactive.
No problem if they are inactive. Everyone can be busy.
But they should flagged theirself as inactive.
We have a TU Bylaws[1] that speak up.

[1] http://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html

-- 
Andrea `bash` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer