[aur-general] even and elasticdog status?
andrea at archlinux.org
Sat Oct 31 20:11:45 EDT 2009
On 01/11/2009, Chris Brannon <cmbrannon79 at gmail.com> wrote:
> -1. There's only one condition under which I'd vote to remove somebody:
> *intentional harm* to the distro.
> But FWIW, Elasticdog recently sent a post to the ML stating that he was
No problem if they are inactive. Everyone can be busy.
But they should flagged theirself as inactive.
We have a TU Bylaws that speak up.
Andrea `bash` Scarpino
Arch Linux Developer
More information about the aur-general