[aur-general] even and elasticdog status?

[Laszlo Papp]

On Sun, Nov 1, 2009 at 1:11 AM, Andrea Scarpino <andrea at archlinux.org> wrote:
> On 01/11/2009, Chris Brannon <cmbrannon79 at gmail.com> wrote:
>> -1.  There's only one condition under which I'd vote to remove somebody:
>> *intentional harm* to the distro.
>>
>> But FWIW, Elasticdog recently sent a post to the ML stating that he was
>> inactive.
> No problem if they are inactive. Everyone can be busy.
> But they should flagged theirself as inactive.
> We have a TU Bylaws[1] that speak up.
>
> [1] http://aur.archlinux.org/trusted-user/TUbylaws.html
>
> --
> Andrea `bash` Scarpino
> Arch Linux Developer
>

http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-general/2009-May/004850.html