[aur-general] Shall I move mplayer-vaapi to [community]?
ibiru at archlinux.org
Tue Aug 17 02:23:17 EDT 2010
On 08/17/2010 05:14 AM, Evangelos Foutras wrote:
> Hi guys,
> I've been using mplayer-vaapi  with my Radeon HD 4200 IGP for a
> couple of months now and I think it's a very useful package. Recently,
> its maintainer in the AUR dropped it because he switched to libvdpau.
> So, I've been thinking of adopting it and moving it to [community].
> I haven't done anything yet, as I'm a bit unsure of whether I should
> go forward with the move. On one hand, a binary package for
> mplayer-vaapi is included in the unofficial, but well maintained,
> catalyst repo , but on the other hand it still is a useful package
> and it only has an additional dependency on libva (available in
> [extra]) compared to the straight mplayer package; it'd be nice to
> have it in [community].
Thomas would be very happy to have this in our repos. :) I don't have
any particular issues with it but this open a road in which we allowed
patched applications in our repos.
This patch wasn't accepted upstream by mplayer devs yet.
> On an semi-related note, I was also thinking of moving xvba-video to
> [community] as well, but it depends on the catalyst package which has
> a very complicated PKGBUILD (i.e. manual installation of every file).
> Therefore, I don't have any plans to mess with that for now. :P
Did catalyst resolved the issues that we had with it some time ago?
If yes catalyst should be repacked properly if you want it in repos,
like nvidia is.
More information about the aur-general