[aur-general] Licenses, GPL3 only
jinks at archlinux.us
Thu Aug 26 13:57:35 EDT 2010
On Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:18:30 +0200
Philipp Überbacher <hollunder at lavabit.com> wrote:
> Besides that, I think it's future proof.
> One issue though is that the meaning of:
> ('GPL2' 'GPL3')
> isn't the same as:
> 'GPL2 or later'
> It only is practically the same because there's nothing beyond GPL3
Just out of curiosity...
Supposed, there is a GPL4 around at some time in the future.
Now, if I receive some software under the terms of "GPL2 or later",
would it be in my right, to redistribute said software under "GPL3
only" as opposed to "GPL3 or later"?
More information about the aur-general