[aur-general] cmake build
ndowens.aur at gmail.com
Fri Aug 27 03:25:48 EDT 2010
On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 2:19 AM, Nathan O <ndowens.aur at gmail.com> wrote:
> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:27 AM, Nathan O <ndowens.aur at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Fri, Aug 27, 2010 at 1:24 AM, Magnus Therning <magnus at therning.org>wrote:
>>> On 27/08/10 06:03, Nathan O wrote:
>>> > I have encountered having the issues with software that uses cmake as
>>> > build system. Usually I get the warnings stating that there is an
>>> > RPATH and Package contains reference to $srcdir. I believe I figured
>>> out how
>>> > to fix the RPATH issue, because a previous package had Rpath issues and
>>> > used sed to add a setting(can't remember what the setting is called at
>>> > second). The issue I have now is the Reference to $srcdir, for the
>>> > package and future reference, how do you fix it?
>>> The fix for the $srcdir issue depends on the nature of the issue. Not
>>> helpful, I know. Have a look in the ml archives for a discussion of this
>>> issue, it took place not so long ago and was started by me. There
>>> you'll find
>>> enough information to be able to do the same check that makepkg does so
>>> can find *exactly* why it complains.
>>> If I find the time to take a closer look myself, is there a PKGBUILD
>>> already that I can use? Where?
>>> Magnus Therning (OpenPGP: 0xAB4DFBA4)
>>> magnus＠therning．org Jabber: magnus＠therning．org
>>> http://therning.org/magnus identi.ca|twitter: magthe
>>> If you would like to, http://aur.archlinux.org/packages.php?ID=22993 I
>> will check out the archives. Thanks
>> P.S. I searched Google last night and somebody stated to do something like
>> "grep -R $srcdir $pkgdir"
> I used Google to search the ML with your email and name and subjects(not
> all in one sentence) $srcdir, references, and cmake, though I couldn't find
Though I just found in another mailing-list about the issue. The ML stated
to do grep -R "(pwd)/src" pkg/ in the directory where the PKGBUILD is at. I
did that and grep returned nothing. So maybe my package is alright?
More information about the aur-general