[aur-general] removal proposal for Ranguvar take 2

[Ángel Velásquez]

2010/12/4 Laurent Carlier <lordheavym at gmail.com>:
> Le samedi 4 décembre 2010 23:58:33, Ionuț Bîru a écrit :
>> hi,
>> because of my lack of understanding of bylaws and failing to comply with
>> them on my first proposal, i like to take the chance and redo the
>> proposal, following letter by letter the removing procedure.
>>
>> Conform bylaws a motion procedure should be sent on aur-general with
>> reasons.
>>
>> Here are my reasons:
>>
>> 1) i noticed in January he doesn't have an account on our devel panel, i
>> asked him to send all the infos to get one and he replied that he
>> doesn't need one because none of his packages are suitable for
>> community. Replying to his email i encourage to get one and adopt some
>> packages from community. At that time we have ~700 orphans and i haven't
>> got any replies from him.
>>
>> 2) no commits in community since the addition.
>>
>> 3) he's not marked as inactive and conform bylaws this deviates from the
>> "above", above being, 5 days discussion period + 7 voting. Because of
>> that i'm starting a 3 days discussion period and 5 days voting.
>>
>> Please discuss the motion(really discuss and not like in
>> previous,couples of hours and the next days arguing about bylaws)
>>
>> Ranguvar can defend himself.
>
> I'm the second TU for the removal procedure for Ranguvar
>
> Laurent Carlier
>

I should be the first one, but let's be the third this time.

-- 
Angel Velásquez
angvp @ irc.freenode.net
Arch Linux Developer / Trusted User
Linux Counter: #359909
http://www.angvp.com