[aur-general] removal proposal for Ranguvar take 2
lordheavym at gmail.com
Sat Dec 4 18:02:38 EST 2010
Le samedi 4 décembre 2010 23:58:33, Ionuț Bîru a écrit :
> because of my lack of understanding of bylaws and failing to comply with
> them on my first proposal, i like to take the chance and redo the
> proposal, following letter by letter the removing procedure.
> Conform bylaws a motion procedure should be sent on aur-general with
> Here are my reasons:
> 1) i noticed in January he doesn't have an account on our devel panel, i
> asked him to send all the infos to get one and he replied that he
> doesn't need one because none of his packages are suitable for
> community. Replying to his email i encourage to get one and adopt some
> packages from community. At that time we have ~700 orphans and i haven't
> got any replies from him.
> 2) no commits in community since the addition.
> 3) he's not marked as inactive and conform bylaws this deviates from the
> "above", above being, 5 days discussion period + 7 voting. Because of
> that i'm starting a 3 days discussion period and 5 days voting.
> Please discuss the motion(really discuss and not like in
> previous,couples of hours and the next days arguing about bylaws)
> Ranguvar can defend himself.
I'm the second TU for the removal procedure for Ranguvar
More information about the aur-general