[aur-general] Tarball Guidelines

[Justin Davis]

On Sun, Dec 5, 2010 at 9:26 PM, keenerd <keenerd at gmail.com> wrote:
>
> I've also come across a bug in the AUR.  In short, the tarball URL
> provided by the RPC interface is different from the tarball taken from
> the html page.  The RPC tarball is *exactly* what was uploaded.  While
> the html tarball has been sanitized.
> ...

Christopher Brannon also mentioned this on the aur-dev list, giving
links to the flyspray bug reports as well:
http://mailman.archlinux.org/pipermail/aur-dev/2010-November/001345.html

I don't understand why the URLPath RPC field is necessary if the
source package files always have the same predictable URL...
-- 
-Justin